There are a couple of reasons I haven't posted comparison photos of the kids yet. I don't think they look strikingly similar as babies, I'd probably be more motivated if they did. I spent a long time debating whether I should compare them by their actual ages, or if I should use Michael's adjusted age. I finally decided on adjusted age because at this point, if I use Harper's 4 1/2 month pictures, she's in a totally different phase than where Michael is right now. So I decided to go for adjusted age. When I look at these pictures together I'm not blown away by the similarities, but I'd believe you if you told me they were related - even if I didn't have the scars to prove it.
Harper at 2 months, 14 days:
Michael at 2 months, 20 days (adjusted age):
What do you think?